“That’s one small step for [a] man, one giant leap for mankind.” So said Neil Armstrong on that momentous occasion on July 21, 1969 when he stepped onto the surface of the moon for the very first time…supposedly. Does anyone else find it strange that decades before the internet, nanotechnology and cloning, NASA were able to build a rocket that could not only land on the moon, but live broadcast the event to 600 million people? Was the moon landing fake?

Top 8 Examples Proving the Moon Landing Was a Hoax

The 60’s was a decade where technology was only just figuring out how to develop the computer mouse, so it’s not surprising that many people question the authenticity of the moon landing. Here are the top 8 lines of evidence exposing the moon landing hoax.

The American Flag Flutters Gently in the Non Existent Breeze

It’s an iconic image for the citizens of the United States of America: their flag, planted on the moon and waving gently in the breeze. Only, there is no breeze on the moon, meaning there is no air in the moon’s atmosphere, and hence, there is no wind whatsoever. This is one of the most obvious stuff ups in the staged moon landing hoax. Of course, NASA tries to get around this by saying it wasn’t blowing in the wind, it was just a bit crumpled from being rolled up on the journey…Well, judge for yourself.


Is There More Than One Sun? Because Those Shadows Don’t Match Up!

NASA produced an abundant supply of photos and video footage to support their moon landing. But, it soon became evident that there was something a bit fishy about these photos on the moon; ever noticed that the angle of the shadows do not match up? Shadows are caused by light sources. On the moon, there should only be one light source: the Sun. So, logically, all shadows should be parallel to each other. Only shadows in the photos of moon landing are not. In fact, the shadows in many of the photos run in different directions. It’s almost as if the shadows are caused by… yes, multiple lights on a film set!


You’re in Space… Then Where Are the Stars?

On a cloudless evening, you can see an abundance of twinkling stars in the night sky. Surely from the moon, with its lack of clouds and complete absence of artificial light, you should be able to see even more stars with the naked eye? Only, you can’t. In fact, in all of the photos taken during moon landing, you cannot see a single star. Not one. Sure, the photos taken in the 60’s weren’t amazing quality, but these days you can capture the stars in a photo taken from your phone, so shouldn’t the high tech NASA cameras have been able to pick up something?


Oh Look! It’s the Same Rocks & Mountains…Again…And Again

NASA has marked out the exact locations of the moon landing missions, showing how they have explored sites that are miles apart. With that in mind, why do the photos from the Apollo 15 mission show identical backdrops? NASA swears that these photos were taken in different locations, yet the photographic evidence clearly shows the same patterns of gently sloping hills and valleys. It’s almost like NASA were just getting sloppy by the time they hit the Apollo 15 mission. “Why bother creating new sets, we’ll just use the same ones repeatedly…Surely no one will notice.”


Carved by Nature… Why Does That Rock Have a "C" Drawn on It?

In yet another example of the technicians on set just being sloppy, one of the moon landing photos shows a “moon rock” which has a perfect letter ‘C’ printed on it. The perfect symmetry of the letter shows that it is not naturally occurring. Now, it’s perfectly credible that a prop used on a film set would be marked with a reference letter. But there is no plausible argument for the “C” just being naturally weathered into the surface of the rock. As a result, NASA came up with a different, though no less implausible, explanation for the rock with the “C”. According to them, it’s a stray hair. It can’t be more ridiculous than this!


Fly Through a Belt of Radiation and You Should've Get Cooked

Everyone knows how dangerous radiation can be: overexposure to it can cause radiation poisoning and even death, so It is should be avoided at all costs. To get to the moon, you have to fly through a band a radiation known as the Van Allen radiation belt. Yes, the space craft had an aluminum coating, but is that really enough to protect a human being whilst they spend over one and a half hours traversing a band of radiation? NASA, of course, said “yes” and that the astronauts weren’t in the radiation for all that long. But an hour and a half still sounds like a pretty long time to be inside a cosmic microwave.


What’s That I Can See Reflected in Your Helmet?

When the photos were published of the Apollo 12 moon landing, many people noticed something a tad unusual reflected in the shiny helmet of an astronaut. It appeared to be something hanging from a wire or perhaps a rope. In fact, it looked suspiciously like an overhead spotlight, the kind you see used in Hollywood movie studios. Whilst admittedly, the photo quality is a bit grainy, making it impossible to positively identify the object. It still begs the question: what could possibly be suspended in midair on the moon? There should be nothing there for anything to be hanging from!


Not Much of an Impact

Have you ever seen the photos of the astronauts footprints embedded in moon dust? The astronauts described this dust as being similar to “talcum powder or wet sand”. That being the case, why is there no sign of impact where the lunar module landed? You’d think that a rocket-ship landing on a big pile of talcum powder would leave some kind of impression in the surface, but according to the moon landing photos, no such evidence exists. In fact, it looks more like the lunar module was just placed in position. This is just yet another blindingly obvious defect in the details of the moon landing hoax.


Please Log In or add your name and email to post the comment.

  • yeahright.comDec.7 15:20
    YEAH, I AGREE!!! By the way, the world is actually flat, everyone exept me is a computer simulation and aliens have infiltrated all our buttholes
  • BuddyDec.5 00:21
    If the moon landing was fake. Don't you think someone out of the tens of thousands of people who were involved in it would have proof. In today's greedy times and lack of loyalty to one's country someone would come out with proof that it was fake. People who believe the moon landing is fake do not realize how much it takes to fake something. People who sell drugs or rob banks go to jail why? co-defendants. Moon landing had tens of thousands of people involved if not hundreds of thousands,one of them surely would have given up for the money today. Think about it could you keep a secret like that?
  • JackDec.2 11:06
    Wiki now has evidence it was fake.
  • CallieDec.1 02:38
    My dad knows one of the men who worked on the fake moon landing project. It was faked in a studio, but I know there are those who believe whatever they are told.
  • marky stevensNov.28 15:17
    The most striking evindence of this being a hoax is not what we have seen, it's more about what we haven't seen. The lunar craft looks like it was placed on surface as there is no evidence of a landing disturbing any dust. Plus why haven't we seen a photo of the lunar module on the moon taken from earth? The power of cameras and telescopes these days is amazing so surely that would be an award winning photo - Life magazine front page stuff - has anyone seen that?
  • ToddNov.26 07:27
    1) Yes, the flag appears to wave in the photos, but remember there is video to, and none of the video shows the flag moving at all unless an astronaut is handling it. 2) Yes the shadows do match up. You fail to account for perspective and the rugged topography. 3) It's not always easy to photograph stars, especially when there are bright lights or objects on the shot. If you doubt this, then where are the stars in this photo? http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_qhPUYlCf7Bg/TPqIzEhOVgI/AAAAAAAABsE/yy-co6CgEfA/s1600/L1010588.JPG Or is this a fake, too? Also, how does NASA, while perpetrating a multi-billion dollar hoax, forget the stars? 4) The mountains look the same because they're far away, and they do change a little of you look closely. 5) The C is actually a hair caught in the duplication process. The photo this was duplicated from didn't have this. 6) The astronauts did not spend an hour and a half in the belts. They were in for around ten to fifteen minutes. 7) Not everything you see on a reflective surface is a reflection. the "object" supposedly "reflected" in the visor was more likely dust on the visor. Since you bring up the topic of visor reflections, though, why don't we ever see multiple light sources reflected in the visors? They should be all over the place. 8) You can actually see a significant dip under the lander if you look at the right photo, and if you look closely you can see little signs of the dust being swept by the thrusters as well as char marks. The dip doesn't correspond exactly with the thrusters, but you'd expect that if they had killed the engines a moment before landing, which is likely.
  • JordanNov.26 04:35
    Oh my the comments are funny. I love the folks that trust everything they see on TV. ????????. The once that say, why would they fake it... Oh boy. How about the 40billion dollars of your money that they put in their pockets every year. And now I'll hear that "that money is used on all the equiptment and cost of going to the moon and devon island , I mean mars... Because they put on the tv that it costs hundreds of millions of dollars. My god people. Have you ever watched the iss "tv shows"!???? The apollo missions were nothing more than a god damn tv series. Im tired of trying to help people come out of trance. Enjoy your slumber. Thanks for the entertainment everyone.
  • Peterk8788Nov.24 16:15
    This is ridiculous do you really think that NASA would actually fake it and spend millions on it??!?? For what gain?? Even with all this evidence they're I see probabally a reason. Also, how do we not know that all of your evidence is real!?!?
  • WillowNov.23 07:13
    For the flag "blowing in the wind" you can clearly see a pole going horizontally the top inside of the flag to hold it up. The rest of the crinkles were from them putting the pole in the ground and the zero-gravity not stopping it from moving afterwards. The one that really gets me thinking is the lack of any imprints on the ground from the spaceship landing. Like wth! xD that's the one theory that I can't explain lol
  • Dirty DanNov.22 00:45
    THE MOON LANDING IS REAL however the moon is fake
View All Comments /Add Comment