There're many people question the authenticity of the moon landing since July 21, 1969 Apollo 12 landed on the moon. Want to why was the moon landing a hoax? Here're 8 persuasive proofs.
ANY IDEAS ABOUT THIS TOPIC?
Write Your Comment
-
What about when they did the experiment about dropping a feather and a hammer and t hey both landed on lunar soil at the same time. I am sure it is not a hoax.
-
What troubles me most about the moon landing real or hoax argument is that it is just that - an argument; and not a reasoned discussion. I am 45 years old, and it was my father's generation that was really a part of these events... And they are proud of that fact. It's a kind of a "my generation was able to accomplish the impossible" mentality. When you try to comb through the evidence with people who think like that, they get downright hostile. You are threatening their paradigm... Hence the name calling that inevitably ensues (ie: "tin foil hat wearing, living in mommy's basement, etc. etc.). This discussion can only be had by parties interested in getting to the truth, not interested in proving only what they already believe. Use the scientific method, examine the evidence, and let it take you where it take you. As for me, lack of stars in the pics is damning evidence. Prove NASA wrong: they say the moon surface is too bright it washes out stars. Experiment: take out a high quality camera to a ball park on a clear moonless night with thenfield awash in light, and snap a pic of the sky across the field. See stars in the photo? Y/N. How about the shadows in different directions. Go to any uneven terrain on a sunny day and snap pics of your shadow against the shadows of local rocks and flora. Do shadow angles differ? Y/N. No blast crater or evidence of even "talcum powder" dust having moved when the LM landed. Take a black tarp on a windless day. Coat the surface in 1/2" of talcum powder. Set up a model rocket on the surface. Blast off. Did the talcum powder get pushed out of place by the rockets thrust? Y/N (Not an exact sulimulation, but principal applies). If you do these simple little experiments, you are on your way to answering this question.
-
The photo of Aldrin that has two elements circled in red with a question mark. It doesn't appear to match any of the explanations. Anyone have any idea what the question mark is for? (The photo shown is from Apollo 11 but the mysterious overhead light is from an Apollo 12 photo.)
-
What you are proving or disproving is a set of pictures. You can't say the landing didn't take place because the pictures look suspicious. You can say the pictures are/are not phony. I'd imagine that the real photos would be classified possibly because of the Cold War. Declassification takes many decades. Again, it's a guess.
-
NASA's explanation for the total absence of stars is nonsense. The unmanned Apollo 10 (apparently) sent photos back from the moon's surface that were published in a 1968 National Geographic and in every shot the sky is full of stars. The moon's zero atmosphere would have been the perfect environment to set up powerful telescope but instead they spent $millions on moon rovers??? All 21 astronauts used in the Apollo missions were Navy pilots ...umm wouldn't it have been a good idea to send the occasional scientist??? But what really exposes the whole Apollo myth is NASA's new Orion spaceship that is supposedly one day going to take astronauts to Mars did it first test flight through the Van Allen belts and back unmanned "for safety reasons" WTF?? It's impossible to believe NASA sent 21 astronauts to the moon and back 48 years ago and we don't have the technology today to send a human on a day trip outside the earth's orbit and back.
-
It's a matter of misunderstanding, and misinterpretations for the hoax crowd. They want so much to believe in the hoax, that they become self appointed experts on shadows, stars, physics and gravity. It happened six times, it's all documented, thousands of photographs, hundreds of hours of videos. Russia never came foward to expose this hoax? They didn't because it happened. Eywitnesses, history books, all involved in a cover up? That's nonsense. These hoaxers also believe the earth is flat. Enough already, get educated and learn.....
-
All of these silly proofs are garbage, and easily explainable, if people would only bother to learn, and stop denying facts like this. There are many sites that love to fill people's brains with crap, and sometimes make money by selling DVDs with inaccurate information. I have seen all sorts of lies from these sites claiming fakery. They are all wrong, but hoax nuts will claim otherwise, plus make up their own facts, only because they don't have a clue how the space program works.
-
This is so funny, if it never happened, people would have been all over this fake landing. Other countries were watching the USA, you think they took our word? The missions were tracked,?if the transmissions weren't coming from the moon they would have exposed the USA right away. We went six times, why risk it that many times, if we could have been caught? It happened, but nuts can't accept that. If it's fake what happens when you finally get caught? See how stupid this is? The landings are a fact not opinion.
-
of the 6 alleged moon landings, & 12 astronauts, all with chest mounted video cameras, NASA officially acknowledges only 2 !!!! photographs were ever taken by an astronaut standing on the surface of the moon, of the EARTH !! & these 2 obviously doctored photographs (with the earth supposedly clearly visible, and yet not one star to be seen !) were allegedly taken on the FIRST moon landing APOLLO 11 by (either) Armstrong or Aldrin yet neither astronaut, nor. NASA mission control, could remember who took the first and ONLY 2 photographs of EARTH (by an astronaut) from the surface of the moon. HOW RIDICULOS.! & no other attempts were made by any astronaut in any of the 5 other alleged moon landings.!!! photographs of the EARTH taken by (ASTRONAUTS STANDING ON THE LUNAR SURFACE) should be the most prolific of all images, & yet ABSOLUTELY NONE EXIST.
-
Do I believe or not. That is the question. I already have my decision. It is no.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15