There're many people question the authenticity of the moon landing since July 21, 1969 Apollo 12 landed on the moon. Want to why was the moon landing a hoax? Here're 8 persuasive proofs.
ANY IDEAS ABOUT THIS TOPIC?
Write Your Comment
-
Why did it take so long to develop skype and mobile phone technology? Anyway, who remained on the moon filming the departure, and who filmed the landing in the sea?
-
The whole topic of the moon landings is still very mysterious. Yes there are anomalies that NASA can not explain so easily the main one is how the astronauts survived the deadly cosmic radiation, even small doses would have adverse health consequences. My belief is that the first moon landing was yes indeed staged as too much was riding on the success of that mission and pressures of the Cold war race with Russia. The USA had too much at stake to televise a failed mission so it was staged at the infamous Area 51. However subsequent missions may in fact have occured and there may also be other secret missions not publicised by NASA. The most important question to ask is this why did the exploration of the moon stop. It may be that it was difficult to reach and may have cost many lives, NASA has shown that it cannot be trusted when it comes to sharing information on space exploration. Until private space organisations do their own exploration we may never know the real truth about the moon.
-
I'm a film maker, as well as someone who watched the moon landing on my television set, riveted. I can tell you that in 1968, the visual effects capabilities were not advanced enough to create the lack of gravity (with astronauts floating with each step, and dust floating in the gravity), the endless horizon of the moon surface, or the shots between Rover and moon, the takeoff, etc... Computer Generated Imaging (CGI) effects were almost 20 years away and we never approached anything like that capability even in Star Wars. Go watch the best films back then. Remember we had news from around the world at the Mission Control Center watching our entire operation and documenting it. The logic behind us suddenly running a movie of the whole experience and having everything go off like clockwork is somehow more unbelievable than the entire hoax theory. We just did not have that kind of technology. the conversations back and forth that were live could not have been rehearsed. Scientists from around the world watched through telescopes, our lunar landing module detach from the main capsule and it could be tracked via telescope landing on the moon. From a purely film making standpoint, there is no way at that point in history that there was the ability to fake those key elements of space. The world media at the time was all around our team at NASA the whole time. It wasn't a closed session. We were just not equipped as we are today, to pull off such a gigantic fraud without being found out. The cost was indeed huge. we were not at war so those normal military resources were used to explore space instead of advance against foreign threats. It was a huge financial commitment, and after from Nixon on, no one was interested in exploring space on the moon or other planets until Clinton administration. That was still too limited for true manned exploration. This conspiracy doesn't jive with the alien conspiracies either. Shouldn't you believe those if you think we are capable of this hoax, we should be capable of having spacecraft hidden at area 51, and if that is the case, why isn't the Moon a huge base and Mars have a colony already?
-
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera has taken thousands of high-resolution pictures of those fake landing sites. They show fake lunar descent modules, fake lunar rovers, fake experiments placed there by astronauts, and even their fake footpaths and fake tire tracks. In a few of them you can even see the fake American flag. Russia, China, and India have taken similar fake photos of fake sites -- and of course, they'd NEVER reveal that the US faked it.
-
The VAN Allen belt is keeping manned missions to Mars at bay
-
Even if it was fake, it sure fooled the Soviets... Hence, the Soviets went bust 22+ years later.
-
The Van Allen belt theory is convincing, but ultimately false. My brother graduated from Mines and has studied radiation for years. Contrary to popular belief, not all radiation is the same. The radiation in the Van Allen belts is very 'heavy'... i.e. alpha or proton and electron radiation. It's true that this radiation is very deadly, because it reacts with other matter very readily. On that same token, as it reacts with matter so easily, it's also absorbed relatively easily into materials such as aluminum. I've been on the fence about this for a long time, but let's face it-- it's entirely possible to go to the moon. However no one in their right mind should think that we would broadcast the event so freely. The photos and video were manufactured ahead of time. What if Aldrin and the rest of them died like the other 15% of NASA astronauts during that decade?? Lol.... how embarrassing.
-
If the Apollo missions had all failed and we never ended up going to the moon, there would be conspiracy theorists claiming that NASA had gone there and the government was covering it up. You can't win with dumbtards.
-
I find a lot of these comments amusing. Someone named Pat mentioned that no wars were happening during the lunar missions. Pat may not have heard of some minor event called the Vietnam War. Then there is Jon who thinks the Space Shuttle Chalenger blew up on the launch pad instead of a couple of miles up. History is not some people's long suit.
-
My question is why would the United States of America spend a few trillion dollars and employ over a miliion scientists, engineers, technicians, and even news people in order to fraud the world ? My answer is that they didn't. The moon landings actually happened. There are men who are still alive, who have been there, but go ahead and keep trying to convince yourselves otherwise. Arthur Larsen
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15